For founders building with AI

You've built further than anyone expected.

The codebase got you here. Now real users are finding the edges, and you know it can't carry what you're trying to build.

Vibe-coding got you here. You built fast — with Cursor, Claude, v0, Lovable, whatever worked. That was the right call. A working prototype with real users is a better position than a clean codebase with none. But the code that got you here isn't the code that gets you further.

Error messages you can't debug. Security gaps you don't know about. A next feature that's too complex for the tools to generate reliably. You've hit the ceiling — not of what's possible, but of what AI can get you through without a professional on the other end. Hiring a full-time developer feels early. Rebuilding from scratch feels like giving up. Neither is the obvious answer.

We come in, audit what you have, and give you a straight answer: what's worth keeping, what needs replacing, and what the actual scope is before you commit to anything. Sometimes a targeted extension is the whole fix. Sometimes the cleanest path is a rebuild. We'll tell you which — and why — before any work starts.

The engagement can go either way. You can hand us the codebase and step back, or stay involved and learn as we go. You're always the product owner. The people reviewing the code are the same people writing the new code — there's no handoff layer between you and the people who understand the problem.

We use the same tools you do. We've inherited vibe-coded codebases before and we know what they look like. We're not going to make you feel bad about how you got here — vibe-coding to a working product is a real skill. What matters is where you want to go next.

Common questions

Do we need to rebuild everything from scratch?
Usually not. Most vibe-coded prototypes have a solid core and a handful of real problem areas. We audit first and tell you exactly what's worth keeping — a full rebuild is the exception, not the default recommendation.
I can't tell if my codebase is actually a mess or just unfamiliar. How do we find out?
That's what the audit is for. We read the code, run it against real usage patterns, and give you a plain-language answer: what's solid, what's fragile, and what it would take to fix each part.
Can I stay involved and keep building, or do I have to hand it off entirely?
Either way works. Some founders want to keep shipping alongside us and learn as we go. Others want to hand off the codebase and focus on the product. You're always the product owner — we adjust to how involved you want to be.

Tell us where you are. We'll tell you what we'd do.

Get in touch